Bij Royal Doctors baseren we onze aanpak op wat bewezen werkt.
We voeren zelf geen academisch onderzoek uit, maar volgen wel nauwgezet de internationale wetenschappelijke literatuur. De data en inzichten die we delen, komen uit onafhankelijke, (peer-reviewed) studies en geven richting aan hoe wij mensen begeleiden.
Tegelijk zien we dagelijks in de praktijk de kracht van deze aanpak: patiënten die sneller herstellen, duidelijkere diagnoses krijgen, of dankzij een frisse blik opnieuw perspectief zien.
Wetenschap biedt de basis. De realiteit van elke dag bevestigt het.
Cost-effectiveness of a second opinion program on spine surgeries: an economic analysis
Daniel Tavares Malheiro # 2, Eliane Antonioli # 1, Isabela Dias Paião 2, Mario Lenza 2, Miguel Cendoroglo Neto 2, Vanessa Damazio Teich 2
D K L Cheng, H Y S Ngan, T Y Ng, K F Tam
D Lynne, E V Herbst, S A Gorman, S N Rosenberg, S Snitzer
Seeking a second opinion: do patients need a second opinion when practice guidelines exist?
Alain Bremond, Amiram Gafni, Marie-Odile Carrere, Nora Moumjid
Why do patients seek a second opinion or alternative medicine?
M J Verhoef, L R Sutherland
L S Wagner, T H Wagner
Second Medical Opinion: Utilization Rates and Characteristics of Seekers in a General Population
Erez Shmueli, Geva Greenfield, Igal Hekselman, Joseph S Pliskin, Nadav Davidovitch, Ran D Balicer, Liora Shmueli
Patient-Driven Second Opinions in Oncology: A Systematic Review
Ellen M A Smets, Joost G Daams, Niki M Medendorp, Marij A Hillen
Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine
Mark L Graber, Eta S Berner
The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine
Mark L Graber
Ethical and legal implications in seeking and providing a second medical opinion
Christoph Beglinger, Majid Hassan, Theodore Rokkas, Yaron Niv, Anthony Axon
What is the value of patient-sought second opinions?
M Bijl, R Gans, M Mustafa
Ashley N D Meyer, David Harrison, Hardeep Singh, Lewis Levy, Mark L Graber, Velma L Payne
Christian Keinki, Jutta Huebner, Patrick Liebl, Sarah Schroth, Dana Ruetters
Patient-initiated second medical opinions: their necessity and economic cost
A C Ho, A F Smith, C D Regillo, G C Brown, J A McNamara, J F Vander, W Tasman, W E Benson
Antje Dresen, Holger Pfaff, Sophie E Groß, Marij A Hillen, Natalia Cecon
Values and risks of second opinion in Japan’s universal health-care system
Atsushi Okawa, Kazuo Kawahara, Yujiro Tanaka, Sawako Okamoto
Second opinion behaviour among Japanese primary care patients
M Takeichi, S Koizumi, T Hara, T Sato
Geva Greenfield, Igal Hekselman, Joseph S Pliskin, Nadav Davidovitch, Ran D Balicer, Liora Shmueli
Patient satisfaction in neurological second opinions and tertiary referrals
E M A Smets, E Richard, J Stam, L Wieske, M D I Vergouwen, D Wijers
A M M Eggermont, A M V Dulmen, J M Bensing, P M M Spreeuwenberg, Th Wiggers, W A M Mellink
Discrepancy between second and first opinion in surgical oncological patients
A H H Bongaerts, B V Ooijen, C J Rodenburg, S C Henzen-Logmans, T H Wiggers, W A M Mellink
Second opinions in oncology: the experiences of patients attending the Sydney Cancer Centre
Heather L Shepherd, Jesse Jansen, Lisa G Horvath, Michael L Boyer, Rachel F Dear, Rhonda J Devine, Martin H N Tattersall
Information Deficits and Second Opinion Seeking – A Survey on Cancer Patients
Christian Keinki, Eckart Seilacher, Hani Hanaya, Jutta Huebner, Marie-Jolin Koester, Patrick Liebl, Tobias Fuchs